Allowed

Mahamaya Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Nov 2021CR. MISC./5085/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a former Panchayat Secretary accused of embezzlement and cheating. Bail was conditioned upon his arrest or surrender within four weeks, furnishing bonds and sureties, and honoring previous undertakings to deposit fees and rectify procedural defects.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail subject to conditions: arrest or surrender within four weeks, furnishing bonds and sureties, and fulfilling undertakings to deposit court fee and remove defect

Mahamaya Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5085 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2019 Thana- HARPUR District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mahamaya Prasad Son of Deonath Prasad Resident of Village- Ora Bagicha, P.S.- Dharhara, District- Munger, Ex- Panchayat Secretary, Block-Tetiya Bumber, District- Munger.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

6 25-11-2021

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶10

learned APP for the State.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected

¶12

to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the

¶14

Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5085 of 2020(6) dt.25-11-2021 2/3

¶16

It is alleged against the petitioner that

¶17

petitioner being the Panchayat Secretary has not handed

¶18

over the charge to Keshauli, Banhara, Dhauri and Bangama Panchayat and embezzled the funds available under different schemes of the government.

¶19

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already handed over the charge, measurement books, vouchers and other documents to his successor Panchayat Secretaries which would be evident from Annexures- 2 to 5 of the petition and so far as embezzlement of public fund under different schemes is concerned, it has been submitted that the same has to be executed through Ward Implantation and Management Committee. The amount of the aforesaid schemes were transferred to the

¶20

concerned Ward Implementation Committee through different cheques under the joint signature of the petitioner and the Mukhiya of the concerned Gram Panchayat. The petitioner has already completed the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5085 of 2020(6) dt.25-11-2021 3/3

¶22

work assigned to him against the amount taken by him for execution of work as would be evident from the

¶23

measurement book which has been annexed as Annexure-7 of the supplementary affidavit.

¶24

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let

¶25

the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Harpur P.S. Case No. 49 of

¶26

2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶27

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶28

Shageer/-

Mahamaya Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahamaya Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abay Kumar @ Abhay Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Abhay Kumar @ Abhay Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Pancham Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeev Ranjan Kumar @ Rajeev Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Asagar @ Mo. Asgar Hussain Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Kumar Vs the State of Bihar