Allowed

Rakesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Nov 2021CR. MISC./50314/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna, in CR. Misc. No.50314 of 2021, granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 1 IPC. The petitioner was in custody since June 18, 2020, and investigation was complete. He sought bail noting he was named via co-accused confession rather than the FIR.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

Rakesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50314 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-360 Year-2020 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rakesh Kumar S/O Ramnath Ray R/O Village-Bharthua, P.S-Aurai, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 26-11-2021 Heard both parties.

¶10

The petitioner seeks bail in Town (Sikandarpur OP) P.S. Case No. 360 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 379, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

As per the FIR, on the revelation of this petitioner and other accused persons who are accused in Brahmpura PS Case No. 143 of 2020, huge unaccounted money, gold ornaments, firearms and other incriminating material have been recovered.

¶12

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the FIR. During course of investigation, name of this petitioner has come in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Pappu Sahani.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50314 of 2021(2) dt.26-11-2021 2/2

¶14

No incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Recovery has been made from other accused persons. Petitioner is in custody since 18.06.2020. Investigation is complete.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Town (Sikandarpur OP) P.S. Case No. 360 of 2020.

¶16

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶17

vinita/-

¶18

U T

Rakesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Dani Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sunny Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Majistar Sah Vs The State of Bihar