Allowed

Mintu Ravidas v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Dec 2021CR. MISC./4624/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to a petitioner in a POC SO case involving offences under IPC 376/302 and POCSO, finding no material to suspect his involvement at that stage.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in event of arrest or surrender within four weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Mintu Ravidas Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4624 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2019 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MINTU RAVIDAS S/o Baleshwar Ravidas R/o Mohalla- Samir Takiya, P.S.Rampur, District- Gaya (Bihar)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prem Kumar Jha Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, In Charge, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

7 15-12-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2019 (POCSO Case No. 54 of 2019) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376/302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6/8 of the POCSO Act.

¶15

The contents of the instruction received by Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, Additional Public Prosecutor, has been communicated by him to the Court orally.

¶16

On 29.11.2021, considering the materials available on record, the petitioner was granted interim protection from arrest.

¶17

I have considered the submissions of the learned

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4624 of 2020(7) dt.15-12-2021 2/2

¶19

counsel for the petitioner. At this stage, there is no material to even remotely suspect the hand of this petitioner in the crime.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶21

Accordingly, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (POCSO Act), Gaya, in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 180/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶23

Saif/- U T

Mintu Ravidas v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mintu Ravidas v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Naushad @ Md. Naushad Ahmad @ Naushad Ahmad Vs the State of Bihar

Chipul Ram @ Sanjay Ram @ Ajay Ram @ Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Aghori Vs The State of Bihar

Sadanand Roy @ Sade Roy Vs the State of Bihar

Prashant Kumar Singh @ Apu Vs the State of Bihar

Prakash Das Vs The State of Bihar