Dismissed
Md. Helal v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./3791/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3791 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2019 Thana- PALASI District- Araria
======================================================
MD. HELAL S/o Hazi Islam R/o village- Gopal Nagar, P.S.- Palasi, DistrictAraria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
4 11-02-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 284 of 2019 (G.R. No. 3135 of 2019) for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the occurrence took place on 24.08.2019 whereas the F.I.R. has been lodged on 26.08.2019 after lapse of two days without explaining plausible delay.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3791 of 2020(4) dt.11-02-2021 2/2
prayer for bail and submitted that there is direct allegation of assault on the head of the informant by means of knife against the petitioner as a result of which informant sustained life threatened injury on his head.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
Brajesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the said recovery/indentured labour case?
Md. Helal
The State of Bihar
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court