Allowed

Md. Vasik @ Vasik v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Sept 2021CR. MISC./35944/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. No. 35944 of 2021, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 413, 414 IPC and 25(1)(b)(a), 26 of the Arms Act. The Court observed that trial had not shown progress and was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, representation on trial dates, and compliance with social distancing.

Md. Vasik @ Vasik Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35944 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-470 Year-2019 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. VASIK @ VASIK S/O- Md. Iliyas R/O- Alampur, Fatehpur, P.S. - Kasba, Distt. - Purnia.

¶5

Versus

¶6

THE STATE OF BIHAR

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, State ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 01-09-2021

¶12

Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Falka Police Station Case No. 470 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

¶14

This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of regular bail inasmuch as earlier, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was dismissed by this Court, vide order dated 17.09.2020, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 23585 of 2020, giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months from the date of the order, if the trial does not show any progress.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner, as per the First Information Report, is that the police got a secret information on 20.12.2019 that some accused persons were going on a motorcycle,

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35944 of 2021(3) dt.01-09-2021 2/3

¶17

proceeded towards the place of occurrence and intercepted one motorcycle, along with two persons on it, out of them, one person succeeded in fleeing away and the police apprehended the other person, who disclosed his name as Md. Vasik (the petitioner) and also disclosed the name of his accomplice as Pinka Mandal. The police seized the motorcycle from the possession of the petitioner and recovered one country-made pistol, one live cartridge, one small Nokia mobile set, one iron rinch and one iron tool used in breaking the lock of the motorcycle.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while rejecting the bail application of the petitioner earlier, this Court had granted liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer, if the trial does not show any progress. Accordingly, learned counsel submits that trial of the petitioner has not yet completed and the petitioner is in custody since 20.12.2019.

¶19

This Court vide order dated 28.07.2021 had called for a report regarding the stage of trial in connection with Falka P.S. Case No.470 of 2019 and in pursuance thereof, report dated 12.08.2021 vide letter No. 143 has been submitted by Addl. Sessions Judge-IV, Katihar and from perusal of the same, it appears that the case has been committed before the Court of Sessions where it is pending for framing of charge.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35944 of 2021(3) dt.01-09-2021 3/3

¶21

Regard being had to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the materials on record and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 20.12.2019, the trial is not likely to be concluded in near future due to COVID-19 pandemic and this the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of regular bail, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶22

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶23

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Falka Police Station Case No. 470 of 2019, on the condition that the petitioner will be well represented on each date in the trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bonds will be liable to be cancelled.

¶24

It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bonds, all the parties shall follow the guidelines regarding social distancing.

¶25

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶26

sanjeev/-

¶27

U T

Md. Vasik @ Vasik v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Vasik @ Vasik v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lata Mandal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arvind Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jagat Singh Vs The State Election Commission

MD Alam Gir @ Alam @ MD Alam Gir Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sri Basudeoyadav Vs Haridwar Gope and Ors.