Allowed

Santosh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Nov 2021CR. MISC./33344/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this anticipatory bail petition under Cr.P.C. sec.438, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner facing charges including Dowry Prohibition Act offences. The court directed the Family Court to conclude the pending Maintenance Case within three months and set a condition for stay compatibility.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Santosh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 33344 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2019 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Santosh Kumar Yadav, aged about 32 years, Son of Rajendra Prasad Yadav Resident of Nauwagarhi Sharan Singh tola, P.S.- Muffasil, District - Munger

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party

¶8

======================================================

¶9

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kamal Kishore Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 23-11-2021

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶14

The Petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

¶15

with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 136 of 2019 for the offence under sections 341, 323, 498(A), 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the initial stage has submitted that the petitioner is ready to stay with the opposite party no.2 whereas the opposite party no.2 is not ready to stay with the petitioner. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 that Maintenance Case No. 113 of 2019 is filed and the same is pending in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Munger. The Principal Judge, Family Court, Munger is directed to conclude the Maintenance case finally within a period of three months from today and submit report about the maintenance case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner wanted to stay with his wife and efforts were made a number of times but the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 33344 of 2020(6) dt.23-11-2021 2/2

¶18

matrimonial relation could not be established between the parties.

¶19

In that view of the matter, it is very difficult for both the parties to stay together.

¶20

The opposite party no.2 has levelled serious allegation against this petitioner but the same is being denied by the counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation can only be verified in the trial and not at the stage of bail.

¶21

In that view of the matter, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed. let the petitioner, named above, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 136 of 2019 subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶23

Ravi/- U

Santosh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Faiyaz @ Rocky @ Md. Fahiyaz Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Kumar Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Satyendra Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Ram @ Lambu Vs The State of Bihar

Sunny Kumar @ Mayank Vs The State of Bihar