Allowed

Sushila Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2021CR. MISC./32846/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a CPL matter regarding an FIR under Sections 304(B)/34 IPC, the petitioner apprehended arrest. The counsel submitted that the matter was compromised and the informant withdrew pursuit. The court disposed of the application and granted liberty to the petitioner to seek bail before the Court below.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed off with liberty to petitioner to appear before Court below and seek bail.

Sushila Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32846 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2020 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sushila Devi (Female), aged about 42 years, Wife of Dinesh Chaubey, Resident of Village- Rasulpur, P.S.- Khaira, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Nath Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶12

Date : 24-06-2021

¶13

The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

¶14

Heard Mr. Rabindra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Khaira (Nagra) PS Case No. 77 of 2020 dated 12.03.2020, instituted under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The allegation against the petitioner is that she was party to killing of her daughter-in-law.

¶17

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been compromised and a petition has been filed before the Court below by the informant in

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32846 of 2020 dt.24-06-2021 2/2

¶19

which it has been stated that due to misunderstanding the case was lodged and that the informant does not desire to pursue the matter. Thus, he submitted that the matter be disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to appear before the Court below and seek bail, especially in light of the compromise having been arrived at between the parties.

¶20

Learned APP does not oppose.

¶21

Having regard to the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, the application stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to appear before the Court below and seek bail.

¶22

If the same is done, the Court below shall consider the matter on merits, including the compromise, and pass orders in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the present order.

¶23

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶24

Anjani/-

¶25

AFR/NAFR U T

Sushila Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushila Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhimanyu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Indal Sen Yadav @ Indrakesh Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Neyaz Ahmad @ MD Neyaz Warsi Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Yadav @ Dilip Yadav Vs The State of Bihar