In bail application regarding a theft case, the Patna High Court examined petitioner's custody status. Unanimously held that applicant should not be enlarged on bail and dismissed application, directing filing of main bail form.
Application for bail dismissed; petitioner directed to file main bail application with affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 32222 of 2020
Arising Out of PS Case No.-792 Year-2019 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria
======================================================
Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhanannjay Kumar, aged about 20 years, (Male) Son of Birendra Singh, Resident of Village- Amani, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 05-01-2021
Heard Mr. Vivekanand Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32222 of 2020 dt.05-01-2021 2/2
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
Anand Kr.
| AFR/NAFR U T |
|---|
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner in custody in a theft case should be enlarged on bail.
Whether the petitioner's confession and repeated criminality justify denial of bail.
Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhanannjay Kumar
The State of Bihar
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
