Petitioner challenged rejection of bail in a murder trial. The High Court noted intent to kill and multiple injuries, dismissing the bail application while directing expedited trial.
Bail application dismissed; trial to be expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32210 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2019 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda
======================================================
Pankaj Kumar @ Fuchchu, aged about 48 years, Son of Late Surendra Lal, Resident of Village- Hargawan, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Arif, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 05-01-2021
Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Arif, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32210 of 2020 dt.05-01-2021 2/2
the petitioner is that he assaulted the victim by means of baraitha on the head and other parts of the body causing serious injury which led to his death.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Anjani/-
AFR/NAFR U T
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of murder.
Whether the allegations of intentional killing justify rejection of bail.
Whether the trial must be expedited in murder cases.
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Pankaj Kumar @ Fuchchu
The State of Bihar
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
