and Ravindra Singh himself claimed that he was informed by one of the accused Kamlesh Singh. However, learned counsel submitted that Kamlesh Singh, co-accused has stated that he asked one Bijli Singh to inform the wife of the deceased, i.e., the informant. It was further submitted that the co-accused Bipin Singh has stated that the deceased was killed by the petitioner and that he was informed by Ravindra Singh about the incident. Learned counsel submitted that a third person namely Sushil Kumar has given statement to the police after two months of the occurrence in which he claims that he is first cousin of the informant and has categorically stated that he went along with the deceased to the place of occurrence and there was some alteration with a shop owner and the petitioner had fired and after hearing the noise of gunfire he saw the petitioner running away towards the village and the deceased lying on the road. Learned counsel submitted that when Sushil Kumar being the first cousin of the informant had accompanied the deceased and in his presence, the was killed, there is no explanation and as to why he had not informed the family members, including the informant, of the incident and also as to why after two months he got his statement recorded by the police and further, that in the so-called confessional statement of Kamlesh Singh and Bipin Singh there is
