Allowed

Ram Babu Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Dec 2021CR. MISC./31593/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who was in custody, in a case involving seized liquor and psychiatric intoxication offences under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act and the Indian Penal Code, upon furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Ram Babu Sahni Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31593 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2019 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAM BABU SAHNI SON OF LATE DEVKI SAHNI R/O VILLAGEDHARPUR, P.S.- MEENAPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs.Punam Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 03-12-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶13

Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for

¶14

the offence punishable under Section 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 30 (a)/ 38/41 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. .

¶15

As per the prosecution case, 400 liter of spirit has been recovered from two vehicles parked outside the house of this petitioner.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way concerned with the alleged recovery. Petitioner is neither driver nor owner of the vehicles in question. Petitioner is in custody

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31593 of 2021(3) dt.03-12-2021 2/2

¶18

since 06.02.2021 and investigation in this case is complete.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the

¶20

prayer for bail.

¶21

Considering the facts of the case and the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur PS case No.37/2019.

¶22

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶23

BKS/-

¶24

U T

Ram Babu Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Babu Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Abdhesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Ishwar Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Bipin Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Gaffar Vs the State of Bihar