Oral order dismissing a criminal bail petition as infructuous because the petitioner had already been acquitted by the trial court. No legal principles discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30114 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2018 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul
======================================================
SUBHASH PANDEY aged about 54 years Son of Late Triloki Nath Pandey Resident of Village - Basdila, P.S. - Kopa, District - Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
5 07-06-2021
This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during pendency of the bail petition, the petitioner has already been acquitted by the trial court, as such, the bail petition has become infructuous.
Bail petition is dismissed as being infructuous.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shashi
U T
Subhash Pandey
The State of Bihar
Prabat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
