Allowed

Uttam Kumar @ Uttim Sah @ Uttam Kumar Sah @ Uttam Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Dec 2021CR. MISC./29424/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed anticipatory bail application pending arrest. Ordered petitioner to surrender within four weeks and release him on bail upon verification of detention status of his son in the underlying illicit liquor case.

What did the court decide?

Allowed; surrender within four weeks; release on bail on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to verification of son's custody.

Uttam Kumar @ Uttim Sah @ Uttam Kumar Sah @ Uttam Sah Vs The… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29424 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2021 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

UTTAM KUMAR @ UTTIM SAH @ UTTAM KUMAR SAH @ UTTAM SAH, aged about 62 years, Gender-Male, son of Late Ram Virta Sah, Resident of Ward no.5, Near Central Bank of India, Teghra, Daniyalpur, P.S.Teghra, Distt.- Begusarai.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 10-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to

¶10

remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶11

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Teghra P.S. Case No. 19 of 2021 for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

¶12

The petitioner claims to be the father of the person who was arrested doing the business of illicit liquor. He further submits that the son of the informant namely, Amarish Sah is in custody.

¶13

Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is

¶14

allowed.

¶15

Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29424 of 2021(2) dt.10-12-2021 2/2

¶17

his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Special Judge, Excise Act, Begusarai, in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 19 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

However, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner the Court below shall verify whether the son of the petitioner namely, Amarish Sah is in custody or not in connection with present case. If the statement is found to be true then the Court below shall accept the bail bonds of the petitioner and if the statement is found to be false, the Court below shall not accept the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶19

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶20

pawan/-

¶21

U T

Uttam Kumar @ Uttim Sah @ Uttam Kumar Sah @ Uttam Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uttam Kumar @ Uttim Sah @ Uttam Kumar Sah @ Uttam Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Sugandh Kumar Jha Vs the State of Bihar

Akhtari Sahin@Rani Khatoon Vs the State of Bihar

Laldas Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Binod Singh @ Langara Vs the State of Bihar

Dhanesh Kumar @ Dhanesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar