Allowed

Jai Kant Singh @ Jai Kant Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Mar 2021CR. MISC./29418/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a case involving offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The prayer was allowed by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to CPC Section 438(2) conditions.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of petitioner on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Jai Kant Singh @ Jai Kant Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29418 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2019 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jai Kant Singh @ Jai Kant Kumar Singh Aged About 26 Years S/O Bacho Singh Resident Of Village-Badhari, P.S.-Rajoun, District-Banka.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

The State Of Bihar ================	Versus ... Opposite Party ======================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner	: Mr.Vibhakar Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party ================	: Mr. TP Mandal, APP ======================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 04-03-2021

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶11

learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307/34 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

Prosecution’s case, in brief, is that the petitioner and co-accused Prince Singh, Manoj Mukhia, Suman Singh and four unknown persons assaulted the nephew of the informant and when the informant tried to protect him, co-accused Manoj Singh and Prince Singh made firing which hit the informant.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Allegation of firing is against co-accused persons. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Injuries sustained by the nephew of the informant have

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29418 of 2020(4) dt.04-03-2021 2/2

¶16

been found to be simple in nature as per the injury reprot. There is case and counter case. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition.

¶17

In the facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender, let the petitioner mentioned above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in Banka Rajoun Police Station Case No. 383 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶19

shashi/-

¶20

U T

Jai Kant Singh @ Jai Kant Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Kant Singh @ Jai Kant Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal Kumar Paswan @ Kamal Kumar @ Kamal Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Hareram Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Sunari Devi @ Sundarpati Devi @ Sundari Vs the State of Bihar

Mayank Tiwari Vs the State of Bihar

Bharat Kumar @ Ladu Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Madhumeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar