Allowed

Munna Singh @ Kataila v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Aug 2021CR. MISC./28730/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case concerning Section 414 IPC and Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act sections regarding foreign liquor recovery, subject to furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and complying with trial conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of like amount to the Special Judge.

Munna Singh @ Kataila Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28730 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2020 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUNNA SINGH @ KATAILA S/O LATE BAL KISHORE SINGH R/O VILLAGE-JAIMRA, P.S BARAUNI (REFINARY O.P), DISTRICTBEGUSARAI.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 09-08-2021

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for

¶10

the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 30 (a), 41(i) (2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

¶11

As per the prosecution case,1245.240 liters of foreign liquor has been recovered on the disclosure made by the coaccused persons who were arrested on the spot.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way concerned with the alleged recovery. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and is in custody since 06.02.2021

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28730 of 2021(2) dt.09-08-2021 2/2

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

¶15

Considering the facts of the case and the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Excise Act, Begusarai in connection with Barauni (Refinary O.P.) PS case No. 319/2020 on the following conditions:-

¶16

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/ her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶17

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶19

BKS/-

¶20

U T

Munna Singh @ Kataila v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munna Singh @ Kataila v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Rai @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aman Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Ganga Paswan @ Gangaram Paswan @ Gango Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Bhagwan Bhagat @ Bhagwan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan Kumar @ Chipwa Vs the State of Bihar