Allowed

Parmesh Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Mar 2021CR. MISC./2842/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a petition seeking regular bail for the petitioner, who was charged under section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. Bail was granted subject to conditions regarding cooperation in the trial and non-tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount on specified conditions.

Parmesh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2842 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2461 Year-2018 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PARMESH PASWAN aged about 40 years Son of Late Ramchandra Paswan @ Ramchandra Hazra Resident of Village- Olha Bajar, P.S.- Harisidhi, District- East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

RAMAVATI DEVI Daughter of Shivlal Paswan Resident of VillagePaterwa, P.S.- Muffasil, District- East Champaran.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. SK Singh, Addl Public Prosecutor ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 10-03-2021

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 498A and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code and under sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner husband of the opposite party no.2. He is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He is still ready to keep opposite party no.2 with dignity and safety. Charge sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition. Petitioner is in custody since 19.9.2020.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2842 of 2021(2) dt.10-03-2021 2/2

¶18

In the facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar East Champaran, Motihari in Trial No. 2394 of 2019/Complaint case no. C 2461 of 2018 on the following conditions:-

¶19

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶20

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶21

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

shashi/-

¶23

U T

Parmesh Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parmesh Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushila Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Shah Vs The State of Bihar

Sarita Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Munna Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Rai @ Mithilesh Rai @ Mithilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manas Kumar Singh @ Manas Kumar Vs the State of Bihar