The High Court of Patna dismissed the petitioner's application as withdrawn after informing the counsel to remove noted defects. The petitioner sought withdrawal citing apprehension by police.
The application filed on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27942 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2019 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga
======================================================
DHIRENDRA KUMAR YADAV, S/o Rajgir Yadav Resident of VillageTengrahi, P.S.-Baheri, District-Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
Let the learned counsel for the petitioner remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office vide its notes dated 17.10.2020, within four weeks from today.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the application filed on behalf of the petitioner as he has already been apprehended by the Police.
In view of the above, the application filed on behalf
of the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)
manish/-
U T
Dhirendra Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
