Allowed

Mukesh Thakur @ Mintu Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jan 2021CR. MISC./27801/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

the court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner pending criminal proceedings for alleged offences under sections 323, 504, 386 and 379 of the IPC, subject to furnishing a bail bond and ensuring sureties meet territorial jurisdiction requirements.

What did the court decide?

anticipatory bail granted subject to furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of similar amount.

Mukesh Thakur @ Mintu Thakur Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27801 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2020 Thana- KATRA District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH THAKUR @ MINTU THAKUR S/o Late Upendra Thakur R/o Village- Jajuaar West P.S.- Katra, Dist- Muzaffarpur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Ranjan No.II, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand, APP. ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 22-01-2021 Heard the parties.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504, 386 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

A civil suit is going on for the plot referred in the complaint petition vide Title Suit No. 125 of 2020, a copy at Annexure-2 of supplementary affidavit. In the aforesaid background, allegation is of commission of mischief by damaging the said plot and also assaulting the informant.

¶14

Considering the background and nature of allegation, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (rupees

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27801 of 2020(5) dt.22-01-2021 2/2

¶16

twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Katra P.S. Case No. 66 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:

¶17

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

¶18

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶19

¶20

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶21

mantreshwar/-

¶22

U T

Mukesh Thakur @ Mintu Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Thakur @ Mintu Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Narayan Tripathy Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Jangbahadur Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gokul Prasad Deo Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalit Kamati @ Lalit Kamat Vs the State of Bihar

Ramashish Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Saloon Yadav Vs The State of Bihar