Allowed

Suman Kumar @ Premchandra @ Premchand Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jan 2021CR. MISC./27628/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, apprehending arrest in a case under Sections 304B, 201, and 34 IPC, directed him to deposit Rs. 25,000 and furnished bail bond within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted upon deposit of Rs. 25,000 cash and furnishing a bail bond of same amount with two sureties within four weeks.

Suman Kumar @ Premchandra @ Premchand Kumar Vs The State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27628 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2020 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran

¶3

====================================================== SUMAN KUMAR @ PREMCHANDRA @ PREMCHAND KUMAR S/o Pashupati Rai @ Amir Rai Resident of Village- Sadhu Gachhi Mali Chak, P.S.- Sonepur, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nagendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 12-01-2021

¶9

Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶10

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 308 of 2020 for offences under Sections 304(B), 201, 34 IPC.

¶11

In the instant case one Moni Devi filed a complaint stating therein that her sister was got married on 2.12.2010 according to Hindu rites. In April 2020 she received information about killing of her sister and also that accused persons had disposed of the dead body and the FIR was lodged in the aforesaid background.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The petitioner is living separately and has no concern with the other brother in day to day affairs. The deceased was married to Vikramaditya Rai and this petitioner has no concern with their affairs. In addition thereto the marriage took place in 2012 beyond seven years.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27628 of 2020(3) dt.12-01-2021 2/2

¶14

Counsel further submits that irrespective of the date of marriage the petitioner has no concerned with the affairs of the husband and wife and the petitioner is not even remotely concerned with the death of Moni Devi.

¶15

Considering the fact that the petitioner is residing separately, the Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner on deposit of cash of Rs. 25,000/-. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 308 of 2020, subject to deposit of Rs. 25,000/- cash and further subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

¶16

The deposit of cash of Rs. 25,000/- shall abide by the final out come of the present criminal case.

¶17

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶18

spandey/- U T

Suman Kumar @ Premchandra @ Premchand Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman Kumar @ Premchandra @ Premchand Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dheeraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Birbal Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Tinku Kumar @ Tinku Mahton @ Tinku Kumar Mahton Vs The State of Bihar

Rajo Mukhiya Vs the State of Bihar

Dhura Prasad Vs The State of Bihar