Allowed

Sonu @ Sonu Yadav @ Sanoj Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jul 2021CR. MISC./25955/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, finding no incriminating article recovered from his possession despite false implication on suspicion.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and depositing Rs. 5,000 in the PM Cares fund.

Sonu @ Sonu Yadav @ Sanoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25955 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2019 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SONU @ SONU YADAV @ SANOJ YADAV SON OF RAMAUTAR YADAV @ RAMAVATAR YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGEBARATPURA, P.S.- NAWADA MUFFASIL, DISTRICT-NAWADA

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Deo Raj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 24-07-2021

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 279, 337 & 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

87 liters of country made liquor is said to have been recovered from a motorcycle.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25955 of 2021(2) dt.24-07-2021 2/3

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. He has no concern either with the seized liquor or the place of recovery or any trade of liquor. He has been falsely implicated in this case by the police merely on suspicion while he was passing through the place of occurrence at the time of occurrence. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent of similar nature and has been languishing in custody since 08.12.2020.

¶17

Petitioner is agreed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000.00 (Rupees Five Thousand) in the PM Cares fund, bearing Account No.2121PM20202, IFSC Code: SBIN 0000691, SWIFT Code: SBININBB104, State Bank of India, New Delhi Main Branch, UPI ID : pmcares@sbi.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Nawada Town

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25955 of 2021(2) dt.24-07-2021 3/3

¶20

(Kadirganj) P.S. Case No. 425 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:

¶21

(1) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. He will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶22

(2) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

¶23

The bail bond of the petitioner shall be accepted by the learned Court below on showing receipt of deposit of Rs.5,000.00 (Rupees Five Thousand) in the PM Cares fund.

¶24

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶25

Trivedi/-

¶26

U T

Sonu @ Sonu Yadav @ Sanoj Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu @ Sonu Yadav @ Sanoj Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Sabir @ Sabir Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Mangal Das @ Jay Mangal Das Vs the State of Bihar

Sujit Bhandari Vs the State of Bihar

Sahdev Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Kumar @ Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Sahni @ Vijay Sahani Vs The State of Bihar