The High Court at Patna dismissed the bail application of Suresh Yadav, declining to interfere in light of the unchanged circumstances and a prior rejection of his application in 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24369 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2019 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui
======================================================
SURESH YADAV Son of Jhari Yadav Resident of Village - Maghi, P.S. - Laxmipur, District - Jamui.
... ... Petitioner.
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party.
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. M. BADAR
ORAL ORDER
7 22-11-2021
Heard learned counsel for the applicant/accused at sufficient length of time.
He submits that the co-accused involved in the present crime is already released on bail. He further submits that except one criminal antecedent, there is no criminal antecedent to the applicant.
I have also heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by the learned counsel for the informant.
Previous application moved by the present applicant/ accused bearing Criminal Misc. No.47703 of 2019 was already rejected by this Court vide order dated 04.12.2019. There is no change of circumstances in the present application warranting interference by this Court.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24369 of 2020(7) dt.22-11-2021 2/2
The application is rejected.
(A. M. Badar, J)
P.S./-
U T
Suresh Yadav
The State of Bihar
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
