Oral order allowing the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application as he intends to surrender before the court below, dismissing the application accordingly.
Prayer to withdraw application allowed; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23934 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-432 Year-2019 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda
======================================================
DAYANAND CHAUDHARY SON OF LATE DURGA CHAUDHARY R/O VILLAGE- WENA, P.S.- WENA, DISTRICT- NALANDA.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar No.1, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 01-11-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of start of normal functioning of the physical court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is going to surrender before the court below and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23934 of 2021(2) dt.01-11-2021 2/2
withdrawn in connection with Rahui (Wena) P.S. Case No. 432
of 2019.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
shahzad/-
U T
Dayanand Chaudhary
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
