Allowed

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Nov 2021CR. MISC./2268/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application filed apprehending arrest in a cheque-bail domestic violence injury related case, the court inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail directing surrender within four weeks subject to bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail; directed to surrender within four weeks furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties complying with section 438(2) of Cr.P.C.

Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2268 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2019 Thana- SIWAN CITY District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ANIL KUMAR Son of Ramashish Bhagat Resident of Village - Laxmipur, Near Airtel, P.S. - Siwan Town, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 16-11-2021

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case no. 276 of 2019 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 353, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with four unknown persons entered into the power sub-station and make hindrance in power supply resulting into the loss of Rs. 2,00,000/- to the electricity company. Petitioner also used filthy language and threatened the informant to kill him by calling on his mobile.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2268 of 2021(3) dt.16-11-2021 2/2

¶20

has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case by making a fabricated story. Infact, petitioner along with his co-villagers visited the power substation for requesting him to supply the power but in return, informant placed illegal demand of Rs. 200/- per consumer. Informant has lodged this case to save his skin.

¶21

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case no. 276 of 2019, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶24

sushma/- U T

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rishidev Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar @ Bokash Kumar Rai @ Bikas Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Vipin Kumar @ Bipin Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Shiv Shankar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Kumara Sushma Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Kumar Sah @ Pankaj Vs The State of Bihar