Allowed

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Dec 2021CR. MISC./21250/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Rupesh Kumar arising from a case involving IPC offences and the POCSO Act. The court permitted removal of defects within four weeks and conditioned bail on verifying the compromise petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to remove defects within four weeks. Bail application allowed subject to bond conditions and verification of compromise petition by court below.

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21250 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-442 Year-2020 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Singh, Male, aged about 19 Years, resident of Village - Sripur Govindapur, P.S - Sugauli, District-East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 09-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶11

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Sugauli P.S. Case No. 442 of 2020 for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 354-B, 342, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 9/10 of the POCSO Act.

¶12

It is being submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that compromise between the parties has already been taken place.

¶13

Considering the aforesaid fact, this bail application

¶14

is allowed.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21250 of 2021(2) dt.09-12-2021 2/2

¶16

Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 442 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶17

However, the Court below before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner would verify the compromise petition and if it is found to be genuine, the Court below would accept the bail bonds of the petitioner and if the compromise petition is not found to be genuine or nor supported by the other side then the Court below would not accept the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶18

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶19

pawan/-

¶20

U T

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sangeeta Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjeet Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Sugandh Kumar Jha Vs the State of Bihar

Akhtari Sahin@Rani Khatoon Vs the State of Bihar