Allowed

Laxman Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Sept 2021CR. MISC./20559/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous No. 20559 of 2021, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to Laxman Mahto, a petitioner accused under IPC 366A, 363, 34, SC & ST Act, and POCSO, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Order directed the petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Special Judge, POCSO, Siwan.

Laxman Mahto Vs the State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20559 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2019 Thana- BARHARIA District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

LAXMAN MAHTO SON OF SHEO SHANKAR MAHTO Resident of Village - Dhanaon Tole Kudiapur, P.s.- Barharia, Distt.- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 23-09-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 366A, 363 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC & ST Act. Subsequently, cognizance was taken under section 9 of the POCSO Act.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, the minor daughter of the informant was kidnapped by accused Saytendra Mahto. It is stated that while searching for her, on going to the house of the aforesaid Saytendra Mahto, the four named accused persons including the petitioner herein abused him in the name of his caste.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20559 of 2021(2) dt.23-09-2021 2/2

¶17

that from perusal of the FIR itself it would be evident that the main allegation is against Satyendra Mahto. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Satyendra Mahto has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 22.5.2020 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) no. 5240 of 2019. The petitioner is in custody since 16.1.2021 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Heard learned APP for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the materials on record, grant of bail to accused Satyendra Mahto, nature of allegation against this petitioner together with charge sheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Barharia P.S. Case no. 99 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Siwan.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Prakash/-

¶22

Laxman Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laxman Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nijamuddin Ansari @ Lallu @ Md. Nizamuddin Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Uday Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Dushyant Kumar @ Golu Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Binju Patwari Vs The State of Bihar

Murlidhar Trigun Vs The State of Bihar