Allowed

Md.Sakib @Sakib Alam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jul 2021CR. MISC./20105/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences of attempt to murder, theft, insult, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation. The court released the petitioner on furnishing a bond with sureties, noting the alleged delay in the FIR and lack of specific charges against him.

What did the court decide?

Directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the lower court.

Md.Sakib @Sakib Alam Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20105 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-403 Year-2020 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md.Sakib @SAKIB Alam Son Of Md.Tanveer @ Tanwir Alam Resident Of Village - Naya Tola, Jorabganj, Korha Nahar, P.S.- Korha, Distt.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

2 20-07-2021

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceeding.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 403 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 379, 341, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner along with other co-accused persons called informant’s son at Basic School and started abusing him and with an intention to kill him assaulted on his head by sharp cut weapon as a result of which informant’s

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20105 of 2021(2) dt.20-07-2021 2/3

¶15

son fell down and admitted to hospital by police for further treatement. It is alleged that all the accused persons are in drunken condition.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He submits that the occurrence took place on 23.08.2020 and the present F.I.R. has been instituted on 30.08.2020 i.e. after 7 days of the alleged occurrence and regarding the said delay the informant could not gave any explanation. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that injured gave his statement before the police in which he has stated that Gaurav Jha assaulted him by butt of pistol and Golu Kumar and this petitioner assaulted him by leg and fists but the doctor did not found any other injury of assault over his body which itself goes to show that injured gave a contradictory statement. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 22.11.2020.

¶17

Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.

¶18

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20105 of 2021(2) dt.20-07-2021 3/3

¶20

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 403 of 2020.

¶21

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶22

GAURAV S./-

¶23

U T

Md.Sakib @Sakib Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md.Sakib @Sakib Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bimal Mahto @ Lohwa Vs the State of Bihar

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dhiraj Manjhi @ Dhiraj Majhi @ Dhiraj Kumar Manjhi @ Dhiraj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Nand Kishore Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar