Dismissed

Bibhash Mandal @ Kailu Mandal v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2021CR. MISC./17442/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court rejected a bail application under CrPC in a case involving alleged rape of a 14-year-old. Despite the petitioner's claims of coerced fake allegations and medical report inconsistencies, bail was denied due to serious direct allegations supported by the victim's statement.

What did the court decide?

Application for grant of regular bail is rejected; learned trial court directed to expedite the trial.

Bibhash Mandal @ Kailu Mandal Vs the State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17442 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2020 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BIBHASH MANDAL @ KAILU MANDAL Son of Sri Manohar Mandal Resident of village- Bangdiha, P.S.- Goradih, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navjot Yeshu, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 20-09-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the POCSO Act.

¶14

As per the prosecution case lodged by the fourteen year old informant, the petitioner committed rape on her.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations as levelled in the F.I.R. are false and concocted. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of land dispute between the families. It is submitted that from reading of the contents of the F.I.R. together with the statement under section 164 Cr.P.C., it would transpire that the narration of the occurrence varies and is inconsistent. The

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17442 of 2021(3) dt.20-09-2021 2/2

¶17

medical report does not support the allegations in the F.I.R. in so far as no physical injury has been found on the body of the informant nor is there any evidence of sexual assault. The petitioner is in custody since 25.6.2020 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the direct allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R. which is supported by the fourteen year old informant in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C., the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

¶20

Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial.

¶21

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶22

Saurabh/-

¶23

U T

Bibhash Mandal @ Kailu Mandal v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bibhash Mandal @ Kailu Mandal v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Shashi Kumar @ Shashi Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Mohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ritik Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ishwar Sao @ Ishwari Kumar @ Ishwar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar Vs the State of Bihar