complaint case against the informant and her family members. It was submitted that the police had connived in lodging of the FIR as the incident is said to have occurred on 15.10.2020, but the FIR was lodged on 19.10.2020, the reason being that on the same day, the informant and her family members had abused and assaulted the grandmother of the petitioner and they were contemplating to loge FIR, but in connivance of the local SHO this present case has been filed. It was submitted that such statement has been made on oath by two witnesses, namely Shivji Yadav and Sukhdeo Yadav have sworn affidavit before the Court on 22.12.2020, stating that the police never took their statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Code’), which has been falsely recorded in paragraphs no. 17 and 18 of the case diary, as has been noted in the order dated 04.01.2021 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, 4th , Supaul in ABP No. 1025 of 2020 by which the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected. Learned counsel submitted that in the said affidavit they have also stated with regard to the fact that on 15.10.2020, the grandmother of the petitioner was assaulted by the informant side and to save their skin, the present false case has been lodged. Learned counsel submitted
