Application seeking withdrawal permission after petitioner's arrest was dismissed as withdrawn during pendency.
Permission to withdraw the application was allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16338 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2020 Thana- AURAI District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
RAKESH KUMAR YADAV S/O RAMKARAN RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PANAPUR, P.S-AURAI, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 09-12-2021
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
that during pendency of this application, the sole petitioner has been arrested and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
In view of the aforesaid submission, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
sushma/-
U
Rakesh Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
