The Patna High Court allowed the bail petition of the petitioner arrested under Sections 307, 392 IPC, and Section 27 Arms Act. The petitioner was released on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties subject to conditions of trial cooperation and conduct.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15475 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2019 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai
======================================================
Rajeev Yadav S/o Late Naresh Yadav R/o Village- Baghmara, Barauni-2, P.S.Teghra, District- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3. 11-08-2021
The petitioner seeks bail in Teghra P.S. Case No. 376 of 2019, registered for the offence under Section 307 / 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, two unknown persons riding on a motorcycle, on the point of pistol, snatched the bag of the informant containing cash, mobile and other articles.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has surfaced during course of investigation. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and till date, petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade. It is further submitted that though petitioner has got criminal antecedent and he is accused in 15 (fifteen) more cases, but in most of the cases, he is on bail. Petitioner is in custody since
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15475 of 2021(3) dt.11-08-2021 2/2
21.08.2020. Chargesheet has already been submitted.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail
petition.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the bail petition of petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 376 of 2019, on the following conditions:
“(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court below and shall remain physically present, as directed by the court below, and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.”
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)
anay
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail petition of the petitioner should be allowed despite criminal antecedents.
What conditions shall be imposed for the release on bail.
Rajeev Yadav
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
