Allowed

Pankaj Kumar Suman v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Mar 2021CR. MISC./15334/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In PNBA High Court, a single judge granted regular bail to the petitioner charged under NDPS Act sections 20/22. The court noted the small quantity of Ganja and the procedural irregularities in search/seizure, relying on the fact that a co-accused had already been released on similar grounds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, subject to cooperation in trial and absence from court.

Pankaj Kumar Suman Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15334 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-423 Year-2020 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PANKAJ KUMAR SUMAN S/O SURESH PANDEY R/O GANDHI NAGAR BAIRIYA P.S. AHIYAPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-03-2021 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ahiyapur Police Station Case No. 423 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

¶13

This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of regular bail. Earlier, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court, vide order, dated 11.11.2020, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 24373 of 2020, giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after two months from the date of the order.

¶14

The allegation, as per the First Information Report, is that 01 kilogram and 10 small sachets of Ganja was recovered

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15334 of 2021(2) dt.17-03-2021 2/3

¶16

from the possession of the petitioner.

¶17

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail after two months, as observed by this Court in the order dated 11.11.2020. He further submits that the alleged quantity of ganja recovered from the petitioner falls within the category of small quantity and the procedure prescribed for search and seizure has not been followed. He, referring to Annexure-3, submits that co-accused Sonelal Mahato, having similar allegation, has been granted bail by this Court vide order, dated 11.01.2021, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 28449 of 2020. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2020.

¶18

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the observation made by this Court and the fact that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Court, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶19

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶20

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 5^th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15334 of 2021(2) dt.17-03-2021 3/3

¶22

connection with Ahiyapur Police Station Case No. 423 of 2020, subject to following conditions:-

¶23

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶24

(2) If the petitioner tempers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶25

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶26

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶27

U √ T √

Pankaj Kumar Suman v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Kumar Suman v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Shamshad Ansari @ Md. Shamsad Ansari Vs the State of Bihar

Binay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Paswan @ Kishore Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Shankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Fajlur Rahman Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Ram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar