Allowed

Md.Saheb @ Sahab v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Dec 2021CR. MISC./15110/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna ordered the release of the petitioner on bail in a gun-running case. The court noted his clean antecedents and reliance on co-accused confessions. Bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 were directed with sureties, subject to statutory conditions, pending rectification of application defects.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each for two sureties.

Md.Saheb @ Sahab Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15110 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2020 Thana- KHARHAGPUR District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD.SAHEB @ SAHAB Son of Md. Mansoor, Resident of Village/ MohallaMirzapur Brdhay, Police Station- Mufassil, District- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjiv Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

5 15-12-2021

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

¶16

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kharagpur (Shampur) P.S. Case No. 251 of 2020, G.R. No.1729 of 2020 registered for offence punishable under sections 25 (1A), 25 (1-AA), 25 (1-B) A, 26 (i), 35 of the Arms Act.

¶17

The police raided the place of occurrence on the confidential information that a mini gun factory was being run. Three accused persons, namely, Md. Auranzeb, Ashok Bind and Bajrangi Kumar were apprehended whereas other three became

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15110 of 2021(5) dt.15-12-2021 2/3

¶19

successful in fleeing away. A number of semi manufactured pistol and other articles for manufacturing the illegal arms were recovered. The apprehended accused persons disclosed the name of the present petitioner.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused persons before the police. He has further submitted that neither the petitioner was arrested at the spot nor any incriminating material was recovered from his possession.

¶21

On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶22

Considering the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent and his name has only been figured on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Munger in connection with Kharagpur (Shampur) P.S. Case No. 251 of 2020, G.R. No. 1729 of 2020,

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15110 of 2021(5) dt.15-12-2021 3/3

¶24

subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶25

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶26

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J)

¶27

Mahesh/-

¶28

U T

Md.Saheb @ Sahab v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md.Saheb @ Sahab v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Mohiuddin Ansari, Vs Fahima Khatoon

Rajiv Kumar Agrawal Vs Jitendra Narayan Agrawal

Jay Jay Ram Yadav @ Jay Jay Ram Prasad Yadav Vs the State of Bihar through the Vigilance Department Government of Bihar, Patna

Shahjad Ansari @ Roza Ansari @ Shahazad Ansari Vs the State of Bihar

Kishori Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Praveen Kumar Vs the State of Bihar