Allowed

Tarun Kumar @ Tarun Rai @ Tarun v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Mar 2021CR. MISC./15031/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna enlarged the petitioner on anticipatory bail in a matrimonial offence case after accepting his undertaking to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 3,000 to the wife and appearing for trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail with bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, conditioned to deposit Rs. 3,000 monthly maintenance.

Tarun Kumar @ Tarun Rai @ Tarun Vs the State of Bihar — Maintenance and Alimony | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15031 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1459 Year-2018 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

TARUN KUMAR @ TARUN RAI @ TARUN Son of Kamlesh Rai @ Kamalesh Yadav Resident of Village-Daudpur Bagicha Ward No.2, Police Station-Shahpur, District-Patna at present residing at C-06, House No.003, Gali No.22, Phase-3, Jay Bihar Colony, Delhi-110043.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar

¶8

Smt. Arpana Bhartee Wife of Tarun Kumar @ Garun Rai Resident of Village-Daudpur, Ward No.2, Police Station-Shahpur, District-Patna.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nagendra Prasad ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 15-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the opposite party no.2.

¶13

The petitioner who is husband of opposite party no. 2 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A/504 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/(Three Thousand) per month, starting from this month, to opposite party no. 2.

¶15

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15031 of 2020(3) dt.15-03-2021 2/3

¶17

petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- (Three Thousand) per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, abovenamed petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1459(C)/2018, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:-

¶18

(1) Opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

¶19

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party no. 2.

¶20

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

¶21

(4) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15031 of 2020(3) dt.15-03-2021 3/3

¶23

on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶24

(5) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶25

(6) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

¶26

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶27

Saif/-

¶28

U T

Tarun Kumar @ Tarun Rai @ Tarun v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarun Kumar @ Tarun Rai @ Tarun v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Aftab Ansari @ Chiku @ Md. Aftab Ansari @ Chippu Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Salauddin Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Ram @ Raj Kumar Vs State of Bihar through Principal Sectt., Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

Rajesh Sharma @ Tufan Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Rai Vs the State of Bihar