Allowed

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jan 2021CR. MISC./14950/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral order granting anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code for rioting and mischief related to a road accident. Bail granted subject to conditions regarding jurisdiction, cooperation, and travel permissions.

What did the court decide?

bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Sahni Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14950 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2017 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIVEK KUMAR @ VIVEK SAHNI S/p Parikshan Sahni Resident of Village and Post- Rewa, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

Naresh Sahni @ Ram Naresh Sahni S/o Late Durga Sahni Resident of Village and Post- Rewa, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 20-01-2021

¶13

Heard the parties.

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 283, 427, 332, 431, 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

There is general and omnibus allegation against the mob of committing mischief by damaging the vehicle which had caused road accident and death of a cyclist. Further allegation is that the mob looted away the articles on the truck involved in the accident. Petitioners were identified as members of the mob. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

¶16

Considering the general and omnibus nature of allegation and material

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14950 of 2020(3) dt.20-01-2021 2/2

¶18

against the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:

¶19

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

¶20

(b) The petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

¶21

¶22

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶23

mantreshwar/-

¶24

U T

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjan Kumar @ Vikky Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Paswa Vs the State of Bihar

Gopal Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Mithu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar