Dismissed

Anil Prasad Yadav @ Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil Prasad v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Sept 2021CR. MISC./14944/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a bail application under Crl. Misc. No.14944 of 2021. The court rejected the plea for bail as the petitioner was the assailant in an FIR involving a lathi blow resulting in death under Section 302 IPC. The court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within six months.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed; trial concluded within six months.

Anil Prasad Yadav @ Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14944 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2017 Thana- TELHARA District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ANIL PRASAD YADAV @ ANIL KUMAR YADAV @ ANIL PRASAD S/O Kamta Yadav R/O Village - Mandirsapar, P.S. - Telhara, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bisheshwar Ram, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 15-09-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶14

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out, by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Telhara P.S. case No.97/2017 (S.T. No.633/17) registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 506/34 of I.P.C., pending in the court of A.D.J. IV, Hilsa, Nalanda. Later on, Section 302 of I.P.C. has been added.

¶16

The earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure P/1 to the present application taking into account that the petitioner is the assailant and there was direct allegation of giving a lathi blow upon the head of the deceased.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14944 of 2021(3) dt.15-09-2021 2/2

¶18

The postmortem report also corroborated the allegations made in the F.I.R.

¶19

A report was called for from the trial court. It has been reported that all the prosecution witnesses have already been examined and the case has been fixed for argument.

¶20

Considering the nature of accusation and the stage of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected.

¶21

The Trial Court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶22

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶23

Narendra/-

¶24

U T

Anil Prasad Yadav @ Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil Prasad v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Prasad Yadav @ Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil Prasad v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamaldev Bind Vs the State of Bihar

Ramdeo Singh @ Rajdeo Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Binod Singh @ Bhombhu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shamshad @ Anwa@Auwa Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Bhuiya @ Rajendra Bhuiyan Vs the Union of India, the Superintendent of Narcotic Control Bureau, Patna.

Dhiraj @ Rajiv Rai @ Rajiv Kumar Vs The State of Bihar