Surendra Rai v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses the withdrawn anticipatory bail application of petitioner No. 1 and rejects the prayer for anticipatory bail for petitioner No. 2, finding the allegations against him of serious offences including murder make it a fit case for arrest. Judge Sandeep Kumar passed the oral order on 14-12-2021.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 1 dismissed as withdrawn; prayer for anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 2 rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14642 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2020 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
- Surendra Rai Son of Late Ram Awtar Rai Resident of Village- Raghunathpur Donma, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.
- Arjun Kumar S/o Sri Surendra Rai Resident of Village- Raghunathpur Donma, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr.Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Md. Sufiyan, APP ======================================================
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner No. 2 who apprehends arrest in connection with the case under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Whether to pass an order regarding the withdrawn anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner No. 1.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Surendra Rai
- petitioner
Arjun Kumar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court