Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition is dismissed as infructuous since the petitioner has already been arrested. Counsel is directed to remove stamp defects within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14214 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-504 Year-2018 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran
======================================================
ANIL KUMAR S/o Ram Dayal Ram R/o Village/ Mohalla- Mauna, Daldali Bazar, P.S.- Chapra Town, District- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bishwajeet Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 09-12-2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.
As per the mentioning slip, the petitioner has been arrested. As such, the application has become infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as infructous.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
HR/-
U T
Anil Kumar
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court