Allowed

Ranjit Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2021CR. MISC./13995/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving Sections 498A, 323, and 504 IPC. The petitioner was released on personal bond with conditions requiring submission of monetary bonds and sureties post-normalcy, along with an order for mediation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail on personal bond, to furnish Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of like amount within eight weeks post-normalcy.

Ranjit Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13995 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RANJIT KUMAR SAH Son of Satyanarayan Sah Resident of VillageKadmaha Kataiya, Tola- Majhaura, P.S.- Marauna, District- Supaul, StateBihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Punam Devi Wife of Ranjeet Kumar Sah Resident of Village- Jhitki, P.S.Laukahi, District- Madhubani, at present Resident of Village- Kadmaha Kataiya, Tola- Majhaura, P.S.- Marauna, District- Supaul, State- Bihar.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kuldeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 01-07-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶14

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy.

¶15

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶17

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13995 of 2021(2) dt.01-07-2021 2/3

¶19

the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶20

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 6^th , Supaul in connection with Complaint case No.11C of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13995 of 2021(2) dt.01-07-2021 3/3

¶24

with the aforesaid case.

¶25

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre.

¶26

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶27

Narendra/-

¶28

U T

Ranjit Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Babloo Kumar Ram @ Babloo @ Babloo Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjay Sao Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Tanti Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Kumar Suman Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nasim Vs The State of Bihar