Petitioner sought to set aside an order. The Court held that the application became infructuous because the trial in the underlying case had concluded. The application was dismissed accordingly.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13575 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur
======================================================
DILIP SINGH @ DILIP KUMAR S/O LAL BABU SINGH R/O VILLAGESUKHRAULI, P.S-HASAN BAZAR, PIRO, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this application has become infructuous inasmuch as the trial has concluded.
This application stands dismissed, accordingly, as having become infructuous.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
arun/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present application remains maintainable as the underlying trial has already concluded.
DILIP SINGH
THE STATE OF BIHAR
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
