Allowed

Vikram Rai v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Dec 2021CR. MISC./12607/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in an industrial excise case involving the recovery of 35.720 liters of wine. The court directed the removal of defects within eight weeks and allowed bail subject to a bond and presence before the Sessions Judge.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount, within twelve weeks.

Vikram Rai Vs the State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12607 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikaram Rai, aged about 35 years (Male), Son Of Shiv Shankar Raut, R/o village- Chain Pur, P.S.- Kalyan Pur, P.S.- Kalyan Pur, District- East Champaran.

¶5

Vijay Rai, aged about 22 years (Male), S/o Shiv Shankar Raut, R/o villageChain Pur, P.S.- Kalyan Pur, P.S.- Kalyan Pur, District- East Champaran.

¶6

Sanjay Rai, aged about 33 years (Male), S/o Shiv Shankar Raut, R/o villageChain Pur, P.S.- Kalyan Pur, P.S.- Kalyan Pur, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 23-12-2021

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to

¶14

remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶16

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Industrial Excise Case No. 311 of 2020 for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶17

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 35.720 liters wine is recovered from the hut situated in front of the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12607 of 2021(2) dt.23-12-2021 2/3

¶19

house of the petitioners.

¶20

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 35.720 liters wine is recovered from the hut situated in front of the house of the petitioners. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

¶21

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-2nd-cum-Special

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12607 of 2021(2) dt.23-12-2021 3/3

¶24

Judge, Excise, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Excise Case No. 311/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶25

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶26

U.K./- U T

Vikram Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankit Rai @ Ankit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Guru Prasad Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Ramchandra Mandal @ Ramchandra Vishwas Vs The State of Bihar

Ujjwal Umang Vs the State of Bihar

Gudiya Singh @ Seema Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Haro Babua @ Kumal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar