Allowed

Ram Naresh Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jul 2021CR. MISC./11781/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court confirmed the provisional bail of petitioner Ram Naresh Rai and spouse, originally granted subject to conditions for the victim's return to the matrimonial fold. The court noted relationship normalization efforts failed and modified the order accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Confirmation of provisional bail subject to the conditions of the order dated 18.06.2019.

Ram Naresh Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11781 of 2020

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13651 of 2019

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2016 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali

¶5

======================================================

¶6

RAM NARESH RAI, Son of Late Jatta Rai Resident of Village - Barati, P.S.- Rajapakar (Barati O.P.), District- Vaishali

¶7

Raj Banshi Rai @ Raj Banshi Devi, Wife of Ram Naresh Rai Resident of Village - Barati, P.S.- Rajapakar (Barati O.P.), District- Vaishali

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar

¶11

Jitendra Kumar, Son of Pulish Ray Resident of Village - Nawada Khurd, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Matloob Rab

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶18

8 12-07-2021 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, learned

¶19

counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anish Chandra, learned counsel for the informant. The State is represented by the learned APP.

¶20

This application has been filed for modification

¶21

of the order dated 18.06.2019, passed by Hon'ble Mr.

¶22

Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha, as he then was, in Cr. Misc.

¶23

No. 13651 of 2019. By the aforesaid order, the petitioners were granted provisional bail subject to the

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11781 of 2020(8) dt.12-07-2021 2/3

¶25

condition for their facilitating the return of the victim to the matrimonial fold. The order further disclosed that in

¶26

case the victim is accommodated in the family, the provisional bail of the petitioners shall be confirmed.

¶27

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that they are parents-in-law of the informant. They have tried their best to ensure the normalization of the relationship between the informant and her husband but to no avail.

¶28

However, the husband of the informant has already been granted anticipatory bail subject to the condition that he shall pay a fixed amount of money as monthly maintenance to the informant.

¶29

Considering this aspect of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to modify the order dated 18.06.2019.

¶30

The provisional bail granted to the petitioners is, hereby, confirmed. The petitioners shall remain on the same bail-bonds. The petition stands allowed.

¶31

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11781 of 2020(8) dt.12-07-2021 3/3

¶32

The order dated 18.06.2019 stands modified to

¶33

the extent indicated above.

¶34

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶35

skm/-

¶36

U T

Ram Naresh Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Naresh Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maruti Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Laxman Kumar Yadav @ Laxman Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Singh @ Vivek Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Kiran Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Sunder Saw Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar @ Sonu Vs the State of Bihar