Allowed

Ajit Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Oct 2021CR. MISC./11124/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving rioting, arson, aggravated assault, robbery, and attempted murder, accepting his submission that he was falsely implicated, subject to specific conditions including a court fee deposit.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions regarding representation and genealogical affidavit of bailor.

Ajit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No 11124 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2017 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai

¶3

====================================================== AJIT YADAV S/O- SATTO YADAV R/O VILL.- HIRA TOL, P.SSAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr Vikram Deo Singh, Mr Pankaj Kumar, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Mr Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

11 04-10-2021

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor (for brevity, APP ) appearing for the State of Bihar.

¶10

The petitioner seeks bail in Sahebpur Kamal Police Station (for brevity, PS ) Case No 379 of 2017 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 380, 307, 329, 504 of Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

¶11

In retaliation to motorcycle accident earlier, it is alleged that the petitioner, along with others, has come and entered the house of the informant, armed with pistol, taken away some food grains, ornaments and, thereafter, there is allegation that they have also fired upon the informant’s family

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11124 of 2021(11) dt.04-10-2021 2/3

¶13

members. The firing attributed to the instant petitioner has hit one Ruby Devi and her two months old child.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He is in custody since 21.08.2020.

¶15

To ascertain the nature of injuries, the learned APP had earlier been allowed time to examine the case diary. It is submitted by the learned APP that the child has not sustained any firearm injury and has been found to have sustained simple injury caused by hard and blunt substance. The lady has been found to have suffered firearm injury.

¶16

On consideration of the rival submissions, this Court would find that firearm injury has been sustained by the lady, but as per prosecution case, the petitioner had fired upon the informant, which has hit the lady.

¶17

Considering the rival submissions as also the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court, for the purposes of grant of bail, is inclined to accept the submissions advanced by the petitioner’s counsel. Prayer for bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11124 of 2021(11) dt.04-10-2021 3/3

¶19

Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal PS Case No 379 of 2017, corresponding to GR No 4508 of 2017 subject to the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶21

(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant proceedings today for depositing requisite Court fee and removing the defect (s), as pointed out, when called upon to do so.

¶23

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶24

M.E.H. /-

¶25

U T

Ajit Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Ram @ Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Madan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar