Allowed

Suliya Devi v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jul 2021CR. APP (SJ)/2040/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna allowed a criminal appeal against the rejection of anticipatory bail, setting aside the lower court's order and permitting the appellant's release subject to bail bonds and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amounts and compliance with Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions within eight weeks of arrest or surrender.

Suliya Devi Vs the State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2040 of 2021

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2020 Thana- SHAHKUND District- Bhagalpur

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Suliya Devi, female, aged about 60 years, W/o Late Sadanand Thakur, R/o Village- Phulwariya, P.S.- Shahkund, Dist.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Manohar Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. P.P.

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 16-07-2021

¶13

Heard Mr. Manohar Prasad Singh, the learned

¶14

Advocate for the appellant and the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

The appellant has challenged the order dated 04.11.2020 passed by the learned 3^rd Addl. Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhagalpur in connection with Shahkund P.S. Case No. 111 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324,

¶16

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2040 of 2021(2) dt.16-07-2021 2/3

¶17

354, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby her prayer for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected.

¶18

An occurrence took place when the informant had gone to pluck Barhar fruits. She and her sister-inlaw were assaulted. So far as the appellant is concerned, she is said to have divested the informant of her personal belongings.

¶19

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that a minor dispute between the two neighbours had been reported. No injury has been been caused by anybody but only to wreak vengeance because of the objection raised by the family of the appellant about plucking the fruits from the tree which is standing in their land, this case has been lodged.

¶20

Regard being had to the aforesaid submissions, the order dated 04.11.2020, referred to above, is setaside.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2040 of 2021(2) dt.16-07-2021 3/3

¶22

The appellant, above-named, in the event of

¶23

her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of eight weeks, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3^rd Addl. Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhagalpur in connection with Shahkund P.S. Case No. 111 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

The appeal stands allowed.

¶25

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶26

Praveen-II/-

Suliya Devi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suliya Devi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

MD Gulab Roushan Vs The State of Bihar

Baleswar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Singh @ Suresh Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Mishri Lal Rai Vs the State of Bihar