Allowed

Deepak Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Jul 2021CR. APP (SJ)/1804/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an appeal against the rejection of anticipatory bail in a Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act case. Finding no specific material against the appellant and noting protest against police conduct, the court set aside the order and granted bail on surrender with a bond of Rs. 10,000.

What did the court decide?

The order rejecting anticipatory bail rejected was set-aside and the appellant was directed to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender within eight weeks upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with

Deepak Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1804 of 2021

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-711 Year-2020 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Deepak Kumar, aged about 23 years, male, Son of Virju Sahni @ Birju Sahani, Resident of Village - Rasulpur Salim, P.S. - Ahiyapur, Distt. - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Spl. P.P. ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 14-07-2021

¶15

Heard Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, the learned

¶16

Advocate for the appellant and the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶17

The appellant has challenged the order dated 16.01.2021 passed by the learned 3^rd Addl. Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 711 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Sections

¶18

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1804 of 2021(2) dt.14-07-2021 2/3

¶19

341, 147, 149, 323, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian

¶20

Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r) and 3(2)(Va) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected.

¶21

It has been alleged in the F.I.R. that when the informant in his capacity as A.S.I. had gone to pacify the warring parties, he was abused by taking his caste name.

¶22

The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that he has been named in this case on motivated grounds and on stray information provided to the officer-in-charge of the concerned police station. He has further submitted that there is nothing specific against the appellant and in fact, he has been made accused in this case because he was protesting against the unethical ways of the police in handling a private dispute between two group of villagers.

¶23

Regard being had to the nature of accusation and taking into account that the appellant does not have criminal antecedents, the order dated 16.01.2021,

¶24

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1804 of 2021(2) dt.14-07-2021 3/3

¶25

referred to above, is set-aside.

¶26

The appellant, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of eight weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3^rd Addl. Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 711 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶27

The appeal stands allowed.

¶28

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶29

Praveen-II/-

¶30

U T

Deepak Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Anupam Vs the State of Bihar

Sahab Kumar @ Babu Saheb Vs The State of Bihar

Purnanand Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Rekha Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Rajesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Sharma Vs the State of Bihar