Allowed

Rakesh Prasad Singh @ Rakesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Nov 2021CR. APP (SJ)/1527/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed the appeal against the rejection of anticipatory bail. The court set aside the lower court order and directed the release of appellants on bail upon furnishing bonds and within four weeks, citing omnibus allegations and a background land dispute.

What did the court decide?

Appellants directed to be released on bail within four weeks by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Rakesh Prasad Singh @ Rakesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1527 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2020 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rakesh Prasad Singh @ Rakesh Singh Son of - Late Tarkeshwar Singh Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶5

Nitish Kumar Singh @ Nitish Kumar @ Rohit Raj Singh Son of - Late Sudarshan Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶6

Dewanand Kumar @ Dewanand Kumar Singh @ Dewanand Singh Son of - Shri Bhagwan Singh Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶7

Motilal Singh Son of - Late Laddu Singh Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶8

Jawahar Singh @ Jawahir Singh Son of - Late Laddu Singh Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶9

Punyadeo Kumar Sah @ Punyadeo Sah Son of - Badri Sah Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶10

Prakash Saha @ Prakash Sah Son of - Sagar Sah @ Brij Kishor Sah Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶11

Shankar Sah Son of - Saryu Sah Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶12

Kameshwar Sah Son of - Late Gugul Sah Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶13

Shri Bhagwan Singh Son of - Late Laddu Singh Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶14

Sheojee Singh Son of - Late Tarkeshwar Singh Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶15

Anish Kumar Singh @ Anish Singh Son of - Baban Singh Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶16

Tinku Singh Son of - Pashpati Singh Resident of Village- Lohara, P.S.Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶17

Ritik Raj Singh Son of - Late Sudarshan Prasad Singh Resident of VillageLohara, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.A.G.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1527 of 2021(2) dt.01-11-2021 2/4

¶23

======================================================

¶24

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶25

2 01-11-2021

¶26

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and

¶27

learned APP for the State.

¶28

Learned counsel for the appellants is expected

¶29

to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for

¶30

depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office.

¶31

The appellants have challenged the order dated 12.11.2020 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST(POA) Act, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 457 of 2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 354, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby the prayer for being released on anticipatory bail has been rejected.

¶32

Learned counsel for the appellants submits

¶33

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1527 of 2021(2) dt.01-11-2021 3/4

¶34

that the allegation against the appellants is omnibus and general and there is counter version of the occurrence also. There is also a land dispute between the parties and in the background of land dispute, this false case has been instituted against the appellants. Moreover, the occurrence has not been committed in public view, hence the provisions of the SC/ST Act shall not be attracted. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that appellants have no criminal antecedent.

¶35

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court deems it appropriate to set aside the order dated 12.11.2020. The appeal is hereby allowed.

¶36

The appellants, above named are directed to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today and on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional

¶37

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1527 of 2021(2) dt.01-11-2021 4/4

¶38

Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act,

¶39

Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Mufassil

¶40

P.S. Case No. 457 of 2020.

¶41

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶42

Shageer/-

¶43

U T

Rakesh Prasad Singh @ Rakesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Prasad Singh @ Rakesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhananjay Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar @ Ajit Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rukman @ Lukman Vs The State of Bihar

Simlesh Rai @ Simlesh Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar