Allowed

Ravi Subba @ Ravi Bahadur Subba v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Jul 2021CR. APP (SJ)/1255/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an appeal against the rejection of a petition for anticipatory bail. The court held that no offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was made out against the appellants, who are members of Scheduled Tribes, merely because they used caste names. It directed their release on bail.

What did the court decide?

Appellants directed to be released on bail upon arrest/surrender within eight weeks, furnishing bonds with sureties under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Ravi Subba @ Ravi Bahadur Subba Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1255 of 2021

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2020 Thana- BHANGHA District- West Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

RAVI SUBBA @ RAVI BAHADUR SUBBA, S/o Awadhesh Subba @ Awadhesh Prasad Resident of Rampur, Mishan, P.S.- Bhangaha, DistrictWest Champaran.

¶6

Awadhesh Subba @ Awadhesh Prasad S/o Late Laxman Subba Resident of Rampur, Mishan, P.S.- Bhangaha, District- West Champaran.

¶7

Dilip Subba @ Dilip Kumar S/o Awadhesh Subba @ Awadhesh Prasad Resident of Rampur, Mishan, P.S.- Bhangaha, District- West Champaran.

¶8

Rajkumari Devi W/o Late Ganesh Subba Resident of Rampur, Mishan, P.S.Bhangaha, District- West Champaran.

¶9

Umawati Devi W/o Awadhesh Subba @ Awadhesh Prasad Resident of Rampur, Mishan, P.S.- Bhangaha, District- West Champaran.

¶10

Simran Devi W/o Manoj Mahato Resident of Velsandi, P.S.- Gaunaha, District- West Champaran.

¶11

Manoj Mahato @ Manoj Kaji S/o Sheshkant Kaji Resident of Velsandi, P.S.Gaunaha, District- West Champaran.

¶12

... ... Appellant/s

¶13

Versus

¶14

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 02-07-2021 Heard Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1255 of 2021(2) dt.02-07-2021 2/5

¶18

Advocate for the appellants and Mr. Binay Krishna, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶19

The appellants have challenged the order dated 26.11.2020, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 1^st cum Special Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran, in A.B.P. No. 1801 of 2020, arising out of SC/ST Bhangaha P. S. Case No. 37 of 2020, whereby the prayer made on behalf of the appellants for grant of anticipatory bail for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 427, 307, 354 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s)(v) (a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, has been rejected.

¶20

It has been alleged in the F.I.R. that the appellants came to the house of the informant and assaulted him and others.

¶21

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellants that from the narration in the F.I.R. itself, it would appear that there is a land dispute between the

¶22

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1255 of 2021(2) dt.02-07-2021 3/5

¶23

parties which has been continuing since before.

¶24

So far as appellant nos. 3 to 7 are concerned,

¶25

they are not stated to have assaulted or abused anyone of the members of the prosecution party. So far as the accusation against appellant nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, they are said to have pulled and assaulted the informant, respectively. However, the injury report of Lilawati Devi, who is one of the victims, shows that she has received simple injuries caused by hard and blunt substance. The informant also has received simple injuries.

¶26

The learned counsel for the appellants, therefore, has submitted that in absence of any eyewitness accounts to the aforesaid occurrence and in view of past enemity, the charges have been over exaggerated.

¶27

So far as the offences under the provisions of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is concerned, it has been submitted that the appellants are themselves members

¶28

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1255 of 2021(2) dt.02-07-2021 4/5

¶29

of Scheduled Tribes and therefore it would not be

¶30

expected of them to demean the members of the prosecution side by taking their caste name.

¶31

The learned Advocate for the appellants, therefore, submits that no offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 can at all be said to have been made out.

¶32

For the afore-stated reasons, the order dated

¶33

26.11.2020, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 1^st cum Special Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran, is set aside.

¶34

The appeal stands allowed.

¶35

The appellants, above-named, are directed to

¶36

be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight

¶37

weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of

¶38

the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

¶39

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1255 of 2021(2) dt.02-07-2021 5/5

¶40

Additional District and Sessions Judge 1^st cum Special Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with SC/ST Bhangaha P. S. Case No. 37 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶41

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶42

skm/-

¶43

U T

Ravi Subba @ Ravi Bahadur Subba v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Subba @ Ravi Bahadur Subba v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Panchdeo Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Laddu Yadav @ Swaminath Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Gulabi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar