The High Court of Patna granted the appellants permission to withdraw the criminal appeal due to their judicial custody during pendency, resulting in its dismissal.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1109 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2016 Thana- SC/ST District- Gaya
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
Counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw
this appeal as during pendency of the appeal, the appellants have been taken into judicial custody.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this appeal filed in connection with
SC/ST P.S. Case No. 45 of 2016 is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
A.K.V.//-
U T
Upendra Kumar Sharma and Ors.
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
