Allowed

Munmun Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Mar 2021CR. APP (SJ)/1060/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal challenges the rejection of regular bail for Munmun Singh in a murder and SC/ST atrocity case. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and directed the release of the appellant on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The appellant is directed to be released on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the learned Additional Sessions Judge I, Rohtas.

Munmun Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1060 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2019 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUNMUN SINGH aged about 27 years Son of Late Awadh Singh @ Awadh Bihari Singh Resident of Village - Bishrampur, P.s.- Sasaram (Muffassil), Dist.- Rohtas (Bihar)

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Ravindra Kr Sinha No.2, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 02-03-2021

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the State.

¶11

The present appeal is directed against the order dated 10.11.2020, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge I, Rohtas at Sasaram in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby regular bail of the appellant has been rejected.

¶12

Specific allegation is against co-accused Bhodhyu Yadav @ Rakesh yadav to have caused fire arm injury to the deceased.

¶13

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the appellant and

¶14

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1060 of 2021(2) dt.02-03-2021 2/2

¶15

Similarly situated co-accused Ritesh Singh and Gorakh Sah has already been allowed bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 31.1.2020, passed in Cr.Appeal(SJ) No. 437/2020. Appellant has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition. Appellant is in custody since 24.8.2020 and charges have also been framed.

¶16

Having regard to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the materials available on record, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 10.11.2020, is set aside.

¶17

Accordingly, appellant, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge I Rohtas at Sasaram in Sasaram Mufasil Police Station Case No. 139 of 2019.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶19

Shashi

¶20

U T

Munmun Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munmun Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rangila Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Swaroop Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rustam Yadav @ Rustam Kumar @ Rustan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hemant Kumar @ Kumar Hemant Vs The State of Bihar

Madhav Mishra @ Madhvendra Mishra @ Madhavendra Mishra Vs the State of Bihar

Shailesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar