The High Court of Patna dismissed the Second Appeal due to the non-substitution of legal heirs of the deceased appellant No. 1, noting non-compliance with a prior order.
The Appeal was dismissed as a whole due to lack of substitution of legal heirs of the deceased Appellant No. 1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SECOND APPEAL No.305 of 2001
======================================================
SITA RAM SINGH and ORS
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
SHIV SHANKAR SINGH and ORS
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Krishna Kishore Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
13 05-02-2020
As per office note dated 03-02-2020, due to noncompliance of order dated 07-11-2019, it is deemed that legal heirs of appellant No. 1 have not been substituted.
In view of the same, this appeal stands dismissed as a whole due to non-substitution of legal heirs of the deceasedappellant No. 1.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
A.K.V.//-
U
Sita Ram Singh and Ors
Shiv Shankar Singh and Ors
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
