The High Court, Patna, dismissed a civil miscellaneous petition challenging the rejection of a probate application. The Court held the petition infructuous as the main probate case had already concluded with a final judgment under appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.765 of 2017
======================================================
Rabi Prakash Sah son of Late Shyam Sundar Sah, resident of villageJagdishpur, P.S.- Jagdishpur District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate For the Respondent/s : ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 24-02-2020
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.765 of 2017 dt.24-02-2020 2/2
either party at the time of passing of the order dated 25.07.2017 by which, inter alia , further proceeding in the said probate case was directed to remain stayed. Further, it is stated on behalf of the petitioner that the final judgment dated 20.07.2017 has already been made subject matter of First Appeal No. 236 of 2019 which is said to be pending before a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 25.02.2020 |
| Transmission Date | NA |
Rabi Prakash Sah
Prabhash Chandra Sah
Shambhu Prasad Sah
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
